UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM SD

Specialized Disclosure Report

Fiserv, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Lynn S. McCreary

Chief Legal Officer

(262) 879-5000

(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.)

Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:

Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure

A copy of the Conflict Minerals Report for Fiserv, Inc. for the reporting period January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 is provided as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD and is publicly available at https://investors.fiserv.com/index.php/corporate-governance under the heading “Conflict Minerals Report.”

As required by Item 1.01 of this Form SD, a Conflict Minerals Report has been filed as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD.

Section 2 – Exhibits

The following exhibit is filed as part of this Form SD:

Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report for the reporting period January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.

Date: May 29, 2020

Exhibit 1.01

Fiserv, Inc.

Conflict Minerals Report

2019

This Conflict Minerals Report of Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv”) has been prepared in accordance with Rule 13p-1 and Form SD (the “Rule”) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the reporting period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.

Background

In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) was enacted, predominately focused on financial regulatory reform. Section 1502 of the Act specifically relates to Conflict Minerals (as defined below), as implemented in accordance with the Rule as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The Rule requires SEC registrants to make annual disclosures each calendar year where Conflict Minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by the SEC registrant, including if the products are contracted by the registrant to be manufactured on their behalf by suppliers or other third-parties. Conflict Minerals covered by the Rule consist of gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, and wolframite, including their derivatives consisting of tin, tungsten, and tantalum (collectively, “Conflict Minerals”).

Where the registrant determines that Conflict Minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of the product, the registrant is required to file Form SD with the SEC for the reporting calendar year, after conducting a good faith review, which includes a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”). The RCOI is reasonably designed to determine whether any Conflict Minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or other adjoining countries as described within the Rule (i.e. the Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and Angola) (collectively, including the DRC, the “Covered Countries”) and not from recycled or scrap sources. Industry associations including, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”), the Responsible Business Alliance (formerly known as the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative promote programs and global awareness to address Conflict Minerals risks.

1

Based on its RCOI, if the registrant knows, or has reason to believe, that its Conflict Minerals may have originated in a Covered Country and may not be from recycled or scrap sources, the registrant must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of its Conflict Minerals and file a conflict minerals report as an exhibit to Form SD summarizing its due diligence, all in accordance with the Rule.

Fiserv has performed a good faith country of origin inquiry and continues to work closely with our suppliers to meet industry standards on responsible mineral sourcing. Based upon this review, certain surveyed suppliers have reported limitations in their ability to map the entirety of their supply-chains with regard to the origin and chain of custody of Conflict Minerals necessary for the functionality or production of our products in all circumstances. The following is a summary of the RCOI.

Consistent with the provisions of the Rule, the SEC’s Statement on the Effect of the Recent Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule, dated April 29, 2014, the SEC’s Order Issuing Stay, dated May 2, 2014, and the SEC’s Updated Statement on the Effect of the Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule, dated April 7, 2017, this Conflict Minerals Report has not been audited by a third party.

Company Overview

Fiserv is a global provider of financial services technology, serving banks, credit unions, other financial institutions and merchants. Fiserv operates through three primary business segments: Merchant Acceptance (“Acceptance”), Financial Technology (“Fintech”) and Payments and Network (“Payments”).

2

3

With respect to Fiserv’s products that contain Conflict Minerals, we are multiple sub-suppliers removed from the originating source of the Conflict Minerals, which are obtained by our direct suppliers’ through their downstream supply-chains. These supply-chains may include additional intermediary suppliers and/or distributors, smelters, refiners or mines. Fiserv does not directly purchase Conflict Minerals from these underlying sources. However, based upon an RCOI review, we have determined that we contract to manufacture POS devices, payment cards, including EMV chip enabled payment cards, and hardware onto which we load memory and software (collectively, “Covered Products”) that could contain Conflict Minerals, and that such Conflict Minerals contained within those products are necessary for the functionality or production of the Covered Products.

Conflict Minerals Disclosure

In accordance with the Rule, we conducted a good faith RCOI regarding the use of Conflict Minerals that was reasonably designed to determine whether any of the Conflict Minerals originated in the Covered Countries, and whether any of the Conflict Minerals may be from recycled or scrap sources. To conduct the RCOI, we: (1) identified product categories and parts in those categories that may contain Conflict Minerals; (2) identified our direct suppliers who manufactured or supplied those products or parts; (3) reviewed supplier information with our internal sourcing team; and (4) contacted each supplier and requested information on: (a) the Conflict Minerals that may be contained within the products and (b) the source of the Conflict Minerals, including smelter/refinery information.

Fiserv does not have a direct relationship with downstream smelters and/or refiners within our direct suppliers’ supply-chain. Accordingly, we rely on our direct suppliers to complete the Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”), a widely used reporting tool for conflict minerals due diligence that was originally developed by the Responsible Business Alliance (then known as the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition) and the Global e-Sustainability Initiative and now maintained by the Responsible Minerals Initiative. Based upon the structure of our supply-chain and the lack of direct access to sub-tier suppliers, we rely on our direct suppliers to provide information on the origin of the Conflict Minerals contained in products or parts purchased from them by conducting a supply-chain survey using the CMRT.

4

We received responses all suppliers, however some supplier responses were incomplete, or the supplier was unable to obtain all necessary information from their downstream suppliers in order to verify the origin of Conflict Minerals. We continue to work with our suppliers to improve the quality and thoroughness of information received from survey responses. In cases where our suppliers have not adequately confirmed or identified the source or origin of Conflict Minerals in our Covered Products, it is possible that such Conflict Minerals may have originated in Covered Countries and are not from scrap or recycled sources.

The statements above are based on Fiserv’s RCOI performed in good faith. These statements are based on information collected by suppliers and other related third parties that may have been collected by the supplier(s) as part of the RCOI review. As a result, a number of factors may impact or otherwise affect Fiserv’s Conflict Minerals reporting. These factors include, but are not limited to, incomplete supplier data, incomplete smelter data, errors or omissions by suppliers in responding to Conflict Minerals informational survey requests, suppliers or smelters within a direct supplier’s supply-chain that have failed to provide information or have provided incomplete information, errors or omissions by smelters, errors in publicly available data, oversights or errors in conflict free smelter audits, materials sourced from the Covered Countries being declared secondary materials, illegally tagged Conflict Minerals from the Covered Countries being introduced into the supply-chain, companies no longer in a business relationship with Fiserv who have not provided Conflict Minerals information, certification programs not being equally advanced for all industry segments and metals, and smuggling of Conflict Minerals to countries beyond the scope of the Covered Countries.

5